The Fire at Home
The top news story at the moment over at my home town newspaper is about a driver of a red van threatening to set fire to his vehicle downtown. This probably wouldn't be such a big deal except that my town is Washington, DC and it's a couple of days before the Great Glassbowl Migration (aka the Inauguration). Even though the color-coded Fatherland security alert has been dropped, because there is supposedly no rumors of anything disrupting the ceremony, security is still tight downtown and the street closings have already begun. The parade is marked with both supporter areas and protestor areas and the paraders have been instructed not to look at Bush because...well, I guess that would make the Secret Service nervous, if not Bush himself. (Or maybe they would see he's got no clothes...no, that's earlier, when he actually makes his speech.)
But, to get back to the story of the hour, J noticed one particular misstatement by an FBI spokesperson:
"It's domestic, not terrorism," an FBI spokeswoman told the Associated Press.
This implies that something domestic can't be terrorism. Don't forget that the single largest act of terrorism on American soil before 9/11 was committed domestically in Oklahoma. Who would have thought that such things would have been so easily forgotten?
From reading the coverage in the *WP* this morning, it sounds like what the FBI spokeswoman was trying to say was that it was a problem related to a family matter (as in a "domestic dispute"), not that domestic acts can't be terrorism.
However:
"Authorities said that he was upset because a relative is in the custody of immigration authorities and apparently facing deportation."
Which leaves me wondering: was he just emotionally disturbed and needed talking down, or was he actually trying to resolve the immigration situation by threatening to blow stuff up?
==Dwight
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18505-2005Jan18.html
Aye, I really don't think the FBI spokesperson meant what the story implied if you stopped at the line I quoted. The problem, though, is perception.
I suspect he was simply emotionally disturbed, and he picked the wrong time and place to be so.